Herman Cain – 4th accuser comes forward

A woman named Sharon Bialek, flanked by attorney Gloria Allred, said at a news conference Monday that the presidential candidate reached under her skirt and tried to push her head toward his crotch in a parked car in 1997. Bialek is a former staffer of the National Restaurant Association who says she was seeking to regain her job.

The Cain campaign immediately issued a statement declaring that “Mr. Cain has never harassed anyone” and dismissing what it called “bogus attacks.”

Bialek said she told two other people, one of them her boyfriend at the time, about the alleged groping, so corroborating witnesses could emerge.

According to Bialek, the two were having dinner when Cain informed her that he had upgraded her hotel room to what she described as a “palatial suite.” When she mentioned her boyfriend and said she wanted “my job back,” Cain said he would “look into that,” Bialik said.

While driving back from dinner, Cain said he would show her the restaurant association’s offices and parked down the block. Then, according to Bialek, he slid his hand “under my skirt and reached for my genitals. He also grabbed my head and brought it toward his crotch.”

When she protested, mentioning her boyfriend, Bialek says Cain replied: “You want a job, right?”

But then, she added, “I asked him to stop, and he did.” Bialek said she never filed any kind of complaint but wants the former pizza executive to acknowledge what he did: “Mr. Cain, I implore you — make this right.”

Cain has repeatedly denied wrongdoing and has called the accusations a “smear campaign” in the week since the disclosure that two women reportedly received financial settlements from the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s after accusing Cain, who led the group at the time, of sexually inappropriate behavior while they were employed there.

Allegations that Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain sexually harassed women in the 1990s have begun to damage his bid for the White House, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found. The poll showed the percentage of Republicans who view Cain favorably dropped 9 percentage points, to 57 percent from 66 percent a week ago.

Recap of the Herman Cain harassment debacle to date

1. Herman Cain was apparently accused of sexual harassment by two women during his stint with the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s.

2. Cain revealed his flair for the dramatic during an appearance in Washington Wednesday morning, telling an audience of tech executives that anonymous “factions” are waging war against his campaign.

3. Cain initially blamed the mainstream media and liberals for spreading the “baseless lies” about him.

4. Then Cain lost it on a bunch of reporters in Virginia and his bodyguards started a melee that ended with a father and his kid being pushed up against a wall.

5. Then, the AP came out with a report that a third woman who worked for the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s came forward to accuse Cain of making “inappropriate” and sexually suggestive behavior.

6. A lawyer for one of Cain’s two initial accusers filed a request for his client to be released from her confidentiality agreement so she could share her side of the story. But by the end of the day, the woman had changed her mind and decided not to go public for fear of becoming “another Anita Hill.”

7. The Cain campaign shifted the blame game by accusing Rick Perry’s campaign of leaking the sexual harassment story in some kind of professional political hit job.

8. Perry’s media team went into overdrive, flatly denying that the Texas Governor’s presidential campaign was behind the incendiary Cain story.

9. Donald Trump weighed in on the debacle, telling Cain to sue the women who accused him.

10. Newt Gingrich, a 2012 presidential hopeful who has seen his fair share of sex scandals, had some words of wisdom for his Republican rival: “My first advice is to do what he hasn’t done, which is say nothing until you sit down with your lawyers and with the people who know the facts.”

11. Mark Block, Herman Cain’s now famous chief of staff, doubled down on the campaign’s accusations against the Perry campaign, and demanded an apology from the Texas Governor.

12. At the end of the day, Herman Cain – speaking in the third person – declared “”Herman Cain is in it to win it. And why is Herman Cain in it to win it? Because Herman Cain is inspired.”

Got that? For more – if you really need it – go to businessinsider.com

Herman Cain accused of sexual harassment

Politico reports that two female former employees of Herman Cain received settlements in order to drop their claims that he had sexually harassed them.

The women complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Cain that made them angry and uncomfortable, the sources said, and they signed agreements with the restaurant group that gave them financial payouts to leave the association. The agreements also included language that bars the women from talking about their departures.

In a series of comments over the past 10 days, Cain and his campaign repeatedly declined to respond directly about whether he ever faced allegations of sexual harassment at the restaurant association. They have also declined to address questions about specific reporting confirming that there were financial settlements in two cases in which women leveled complaints. POLITICO has confirmed the identities of the two female restaurant association employees who complained about Cain but, for privacy concerns, is not publishing their names.

The incidents occurred in the 1990s when Cain headed the National Restaurant Association. Other female employees interviewed for the above-linked report say that Cain always treated them with courtesy and respect. Right wing websites such as Free Republic are claiming that unearthing these old claims was the work of the GOP establishment, who are “terrified” of Cain’s popularity.

In less than one day, Herman Cain has gone from “I have no idea what you’re talking about” to “OK, it did happen but they were lying.”

UPDATE: Now Mr. Cain remembers – just a few hours later – that were WAS a settlement paid, he just doesn’t remember the amount…  SRSLY.
(via JMG)

Herman Cain defends his campaign ad featuring smoking

Cain, in an appearance on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” continued to defend the ad, which features his campaign manager Mark Block taking a long drag from a cigarette – and said the ad was meant to be “informative.”

“This wasn’t intended to send any subliminal signal whatsoever,” he told Schieffer.

“It does – it sends a signal that it is cool to smoke,” suggested Schieffer.

“No, it does not,” Cain replied. “Mark Block smokes. That’s all that ad says. We have a lot of people in this country that smoke. But what I respect about Mark as a smoker, who is my chief of staff, he never smokes around me or smokes around anyone else. He goes outside.”

“He smokes on television!” said Schieffer.

“Well, he smokes on television. But that was no other subliminal message,” Cain said.

When asked if he thought the ad was meant to be “funny,” Cain said his campaign “didn’t know whether it would be funny to some people or whether they were going to ignore it or whatever the case may be.”

“It’s not funny to me – I am a cancer survivor, like you,” Schieffer said. “I had cancer that was smoking related. I don’t think it serves the country well – and this is an editorial opinion here – to be showing someone smoking a cigarette. You’re the frontrunner now. It seems to me as frontrunner you would have a responsibility not to take that kind of a tone in this campaign. I would suggest that perhaps as the frontrunner, you’d want to raise the level of the campaign.”

“We will do that, Bob,” Cain responded. “I do respect your objection to the ad. Probably about 30 percent of the feedback was very similar to yours. It was not intended to offend anyone. Being a cancer survivor myself, I am sensitive to that sort of thing.”

More from CBSnews.com

Another ‘not ready for prime time’ idea from Herman Cain

Many of the GOP believe that the federal government should get out of the student aid business entirely. Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), for instance, said that he’d phase out the federal student loan program entirely. Former pizza magnate Herman Cain, meanwhile, said that he doesn’t believe in any form of federal student aid whatsoever, believing that such aid is better off left to the states:

I believe that if a state wants to help with college education, then they should do that.

Secondly, you have people living within communities within states that are willing to help fund those kinds of programs. So I do not believe that it is the responsibility of the federal government to help fund a college education because herein, our resources are limited and I believe that the best solution is the one closest to the problem. The people within the state, the people within the communities, ultimately, I believe, are the ones who have that responsibility.

If you want an education, a college education in America, I believe that people can get it if they are determined to get it. They might have to work a little harder.

Clearly there are issues posed by devolving student loans and aid to the states:

  • Would students receive grants from their home state or from the state in which they attend school?
  • What if a student’s parents want or need to move midway through a student’s college years?
  • Would she lose her aid and have to get it from either her or her parents’ new state?

Federal student loans and programs like Pell Grants have helped millions of Americans access higher education. Without federal aid, students would be pushed into more expensive private student loans, even as student loan debt is en route to eclipsing $1 trillion for the first time.

Herman Cain to slow his schedule down

Herman Cain is gearing up to slow down the pace of his presidential effort, according to one of his top aides.

J.D. Gordon, the campaign’s vice president for communications, said Cain will try to avoid future gaffes by achieving a “more deliberative pace” on the trail.

“We’re trying to slow down a little bit, make sure he’s rested, make sure he’s focused,” J.D. Gordon told CNN’s Howard Kurtz.

Gordon added that mistakes happen when a candidate is conducting seven or eight events a day and does not use a teleprompter, as is the case with Cain.

The comments follow a string of statements and staff defections that have received negative press.

Gordon said a lack of sleep was partially to blame for Cain’s comments to CNN’s Piers Morgan about abortion and his comments to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer about the possibility of a prisoner exchange with detainees in Guantanamo Bay that he quickly retracted.

The abortion flare up has yet to die down and the campaign attempted to clarify the former pizza executive’s stance again Thursday. After saying he was “pro-life, no exceptions,” a Cain campaign adviser said he “learned more about the issue” and that he would now support abortions in instances of rape, incest and when the life of the mother is at stake.

Herman Cain Backs Constitutional Ban On Gay Marriage

Herman Cain has backtracked on his position on a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.

As early as last week, Cain said that he opposed such an amendment.

Speaking on NBC’s Meet the Press, Cain told host David Gregory that if elected president he “wouldn’t seek a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, but I am pro traditional marriage.”

The former CEO of Godfather’s Pizza also stated his opposition to such an amendment during an earlier New Hampshire GOP debate.

Cain’s stance on the issue has previously infuriated the National Organization for Marriage (NOM), the nation’s most vociferous opponent of gay marriage, whose anti-gay marriage pledge failed to win Cain’s endorsement.

But in a videotaped interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s (CBS) David Brody after Cain appeared Saturday at the Iowa Faith and Freedom’s annual banquet, Cain said he had changed his position.

“[In your Faith and Freedom speech] you mentioned marriage as well so you’re also, just so I understand, you’re for a constitutional marriage amendment as well?” Brody asked.

“I think marriage should be protected at the federal level also,” Cain responded. “I used to believe that it could be just handled by the states but there’s a movement going on to basically take the teeth out of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act and that could cause an unraveling, so we do need some protection at the federal level because of that and so yes I would support legislation that would say that it’s between a man and a woman.”
(via OnTopMagazine)

Herman Cain and his abortion problem with the GOP

Herman Cain’s campaign has run into his first big snag as his position on abortion – that he is personally anti-abortion but believes it’s “not the government’s role to make that decision” – became clearer to conservative Iowa activists.

“That is a pro-choice position,” Bob Vander Plaats, a social conservative leader in Iowa, told The Huffington Post. “It’s not where we’re at on the issue and it’s not where a lot of caucus-goers are at on the life issue. They believe Roe v. Wade should be overturned.”

Cain put out a statement late in the day on Thursday trying to clarify his position, but he still did not address the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion, raising questions about whether he believes in the legal right to abortion despite his strenuous rhetoric in the past claiming to be, in his own words, “pro-life.”

Dan Savage to Herman Cain: Prove being gay is a choice

Dan Savage has challenged Republican presidential hopeful Herman Cain to perform a sex act on him to prove that being gay is a choice.

The “It Gets Better” activist was incensed at comments Cain made to CNN’s Piers Morgan earlier this week. “I think it’s a sin because of my biblical beliefs,” Cain said on Wednesday. “And although people don’t agree with me, I happen to think that it is a choice.”

On his blog Savage posted an open letter to Cain:

Dear Herman,
If being gay is a choice, show us the proof. Choose it. Choose to be gay yourself. Show America how that’s done, Herman, show us how a man can choose to be gay. Suck my dick, Herman. Name the time and the place and I’ll bring my dick and a camera crew and you can suck me off and win the argument.
Very sincerely yours,
Dan Savage

But Savage had more to say: “When someone argues that being gay is a choice, he’s not just insulting gay people. (And ignoring the science of sexual orientation.) He’s insulting straight people. If homosexuality is a choice, then so is heterosexuality.”

“Last night on CNN Herman Cain said that being straight is something that a straight person can take or leave. Herman Cain believes that heterosexuality is something a heterosexual can decide to walk away from, like an underwater house or a lousy meal. Straight people should get angry when they hear a straight person making this argument.”