You just know the kids heading up the marriage and tourism industries in Nevada have had this ad ready for a long time.
In today’s USA Today.
My state! My state! My state!!!
LGBTQ news and entertainment
You just know the kids heading up the marriage and tourism industries in Nevada have had this ad ready for a long time.
In today’s USA Today.
My state! My state! My state!!!
According to the AP, the group the Coalition for the Protection of Marriage on Thursday filed documents with the high court and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
There is no longer any formal opposition in court to gay marriage in Nevada.
Coalition lawyer Monte Neil Stewart declined to say why.
And, we’re off! Yay! Happy Dance!
Inspired by the news that the 9th Circuit Court had found Nevada’s same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional, Nevada State Senator Kelvin Atkinson proposed to his boyfriend Sherwood Howard.
Atkinson told CNN, his proposal “just came out…I proposed to him on stage in front of everyone:”
Video of @katkinson702 asking partner to marry him after court ruling paves way for same sex marriage in Nevada http://t.co/zRNC9CtShr #lvrj
— Justin Yurkanin (@justyurkanin) October 8, 2014
MORE: Supreme Court Justice Kennedy clarifies earlier order on gay marriage, allows weddings to begin in Nevada: http://t.co/s14EYIin8X— The Associated Press (@AP) October 8, 2014
On Wednesday afternoon, Justice Anthony Kennedy revised his order from hours earlier so as to declare that same-sex marriages can move forward in Nevada — but not in Idaho, at least for now.
The Supreme Court justice’s original order put on hold a ruling on Tuesday by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which consolidated cases from Nevada and Idaho and struck down both states’ gay marriage bans.
It’s unclear whether Kennedy — who has jurisdiction over appeals within the 9th Circuit — had a change of heart or whether he merely made a mistake in his initial order. But his new order reversed a part of his old order.
“IT IS ORDERED that the portion of the order issued on this date entering a stay of the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in case No. 12-17668 is hereby vacated,” he wrote, referring to the Nevada case.
The key difference is that Idaho is appealing the 9th Circuit ruling, while Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval (R) announced that his state won’t take further legal action on the issue.
(via Talking Points Memo)
The Coalition For The Protection Of Marriage, anti-gay organization that defended Nevada’s marriage ban after the governor and attorney general dropped their opposition, has filed a request to join Idaho Gov. Butch Otter’s request for an emergency stay until an en banc rehearing by the Ninth Circuit Court.
Early today Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy issued a stay order that seems to apply to both Idaho and Nevada, although Nevada did not apply for a stay. There is considerable chatter among the legal eagles as to whether that was Kennedy’s intent, but in the meantime no marriages will take place today in Nevada.
Officials at Lambda Legal, the gay rights advocacy organization that argued the Nevada case on behalf of eight same-sex couples, noted that only Idaho sought the stay.
Jon Davidson, the group’s legal director, called for the nation’s highest court to clarify whether Nevada can issue marriage licenses. He argued the Nevada and Idaho cases had been consolidated only for purposes of Tuesday’s decision, and that Nevada’s inclusion in the stay may have been a mistake. “Nothing prevents clerks in Nevada from proceeding to issue licenses today,” he said.
Nevada didn’t seek a stay. Gov. Brian Sandoval and state Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto issued a joint statement late Tuesday saying the state would take no further action. Sandoval, a Republican former federal district judge, said he determined the state had no way to defend its position after an appeals court ruling in another case in February.
So, now we wait to see if Kennedy will clarify his stay.
My state! My state! My state!
Per Jon Ralston of the Ralston Report, in light of yesterday’s ruling by the 9th Circuit Court same-sex marriage Clark County Clerk Diana Alba will begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples today at 2pm.
There is one waiting period in Nevada.
On the other side of the 9th Circuit ruling, Idaho Gov. Butch Otter has requested and received a stay on the same-sex marriage ruling for his state as he prepares for appeal by asking for a review en banc, or a review by the entire 9th Circuit Court.
Supreme Court Justice Kennedy (who oversees requests from the 9th Circuit) agreed to the stay with minutes to spare as Ada County Clerk Chris Rich was planning to begin issuing licenses this morning at 8AM.
UPDATE: It appears Idaho’s request for stay also affects Nevada since the two cases were heard in tandem. So Justice Kennedy’s stay puts same-sex marriage in Nevada on hold for now. Boo!
From Chris Geidner at Buzzfeed:
Although the application seeking the stay only came from Idaho officials, Kennedy’s order issuing a stay includes the 9th Circuit case numbers of both the Idaho and Nevada cases. From the language of Kennedy’s order, then, the rulings as to both Idaho and Nevada are on hold for now.
It was not immediately clear why Kennedy’s order referenced the Nevada case number, although a Tuesday decision from the 9th Circuit might be why. On Tuesday, in a brief order issued just prior to the release of its decision striking down both states’ bans, the 9th Circuit stated, “These cases are consolidated for purposes of disposition.” As such, all of the orders — including the mandate — issued in the two states’ cases were handled in a single order each time on Tuesday, meaning there was only one mandate issued as to both states’ cases.
Yes! #loveislove pic.twitter.com/gWvYG38PD6— The Democrats (@TheDemocrats) October 7, 2014
Funny, for a “big tent” party I don’t see any congrats from the Republicans…
Via press release from the National Center for Lesbian Rights:
Today’s decision, written by Judge Stephen Reinhardt, holds that “Idaho and Nevada’s marriage laws, by preventing same-sex couples from marrying and refusing to recognize same-sex marriages celebrated elsewhere, impose profound legal, financial, social and psychic harms on numerous citizens of those states.”
The decision further states: “Classifying some families, and especially their children, as of lesser value should be repugnant to all those in this nation who profess to believe in ‘family values.’ In any event, Idaho and Nevada’s asserted preference for opposite-sex parents does not, under heightened scrutiny, come close to justifying unequal treatment on the basis of sexual orientation.”
The Idaho case was brought in November 2013 by four same-sex couples: Sue Latta and Traci Ehlers, Lori and Sharene Watsen, Shelia Robertson and Andrea Altmayer, and Amber Beierle and Rachael Robertson. The couples are represented by Idaho attorneys Deborah Ferguson and Craig Durham of Ferguson Durham LLP and the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR). On September 8th, Ferguson argued before Ninth Circuit Judges Stephen Reinhardt, Marsha S. Berzon, and Ronald M. Gould that Idaho’s laws that ban marriage equality and prohibit the state from respecting the marriages of same-sex couples who married in other states violate the U.S. Constitution. The Idaho case was consolidated for purposes of the decision with Sevcik v. Sandoval, a case challenging Nevada’s marriage ban brought by same-sex couples represented by Lambda Legal.
![]() |
| Click pic to enlarge view |
A long-time friend of mine married his terminally ill boyfriend last year.
Since they lived in Las Vegas, they traveled to California for the legal ceremony and license.
Sadly, the husband lost his battle in March of this year.
Adding to the sadness of the loss, my friend had to battle with his deceased husband’s family who never approved of the same-sex marriage. The family apparently fought to keep the body of the deceased from my friend.
Eventually, in order to have a respectful service and burial, my friend went to court to have a judge rule that he was the “surviving spouse,” and to indicate that on the death certificate issued by the state of Nevada.
As I saw my friend recently and were talking about the sad episode, I began to wonder: was this the first instance of the state of Nevada recognizing a same-sex marriage?
We’ve seen legal wrangling in Ohio, Indiana and Arizona regarding recognition of same-sex marriages from other states due to terminal illness, etc. I’m wondering if this has already quietly happened in Nevada?
Nevada does have domestic partnerships that grants “…the same rights, protections, benefits, responsibilities, obligations and duties as…parties to any other civil contract….” But, couples legally married in other states don’t automatically gain this status. Couples married elsewhere must complete and file a notarized Domestic Partnership Declaration form with the Secretary of State’s Office. I asked my friend if they had done this and he said they were in the process of getting that done when his husband suddenly died.
See the death certificate above that lists the deceased as “Male” and the Surviving Spouse as “Michael.” (I’ve blurred the details for now for privacy’s sake).
Experts – chime in and let me know what you think.
From Buzzfeed’s über-fab legal eagle on LGBT issues, Chris Geidner:
9th Circuit marriage cases are done. Plaintiff same-sex couples in ID & NV will succeed, likely 3-0 on equal protection grounds.
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) September 8, 2014