Texas ban on marriage equality ruled unconstitutional

This gives the anti-gay forces a record of 0-5 in federal courts.

“Today’s court decision is not made in defiance of the great people of Texas or the Texas Legislature, but in compliance with the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court precedent,” Judge Orlando Garcia, a Clinton appointee, wrote. “Without a rational relation to a legitimate governmental purpose, state-imposed inequality can find no refuge in our U.S. Constitution.”

From the San Antonio Express-News:

A federal judge in San Antonio has declared Texas’ ban on gay marriage unconstitutional.

U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia, however, also issued a stay, meaning the ban stays in effect for the time being.

One lesbian couple had to go to Massachusetts to get married, and they want Texas to recognize the union. A second gay couple have a courtship of 17 years and want to get married here in their home state.

Both sued the state in federal court aiming to overturn the ban on same-sex marriage, saying it is unconstitutional.

LGBT Advocates immediately issued statements on the ruling:

Freedom To Marry

“Today the 6th federal judge in a row has ruled – in Texas – that there is simply no legitimate justification for denying marriage to loving gay and lesbian couples. The court’s holding is solid and serious, and follows the language and logic of the Supreme Court’s marriage ruling last year and the Constitution’s clear command. With 47 marriage cases in 25 states now moving forward, and the possibility that a freedom to marry case will again reach the Supreme Court as soon as 2015, we must continue the conversations and progress — Texan to Texan, American to American — that show that all of America is ready for the freedom to marry.”

Human Rights Campaign

This injunction sends a powerful message that gay and lesbian Texans are being harmed every by inequality, and that these plaintiff couples who we’re proud to call members of the HRC family are very likely to succeed in striking down Texas’ ban on marriage equality. This is a historic day in the heart of the South, and I can’t stress enough how important it is to move quickly until loving couples in all 50 states feel the full reach of this victory for equality.” The Texas ruling comes on the heels of a year-long string of electoral, judicial and legislative victories for marriage equality. Recently the New Mexico Supreme Court and federal district judges in Virginia, Utah, Oklahoma, Ohio and Kentucky have ruled in favor of marriage for lesbian and gay couples.

Equality Texas

Chuck Smith, executive director of Equality Texas, called the decision “a huge victory that moves Texas one step closer to the freedom to marry.” “The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Windsor made it clear that animus or moral disapproval is not an acceptable justification for denying any American their constitutional right to equal protection of the law,” Smith said. “We are gratified to see Judge Garcia uphold the Constitution of the United States and declare that Texas’ restrictions on the freedom to marry are unconstitutional and unenforceable. We anxiously await the day when the United States Supreme Court will reach the same conclusion.”

US Attorney General Eric Holder says state AG’s not required to defend unconstitutional laws

US Attorney General Eric Holder shared in an interview yesterday that state attorney generals are not required to defend laws that are found to be unconstitutional.

Careful not to encourage state AG’s to disavow their own laws, Holder said that officials who have carefully studied marriage equality bans could refuse to defend them.

From the New York Times:

“Engaging in that process and making that determination is something that’s appropriate for an attorney general to do,” Mr. Holder said.

As an example, Mr. Holder cited the landmark Brown v. Board of Education case, which forced public school integration in 1954.

“If I were attorney general in Kansas in 1953, I would not have defended a Kansas statute that put in place separate-but-equal facilities,” Mr. Holder said.

The nation’s first black attorney general, Mr. Holder has said he views today’s gay-rights campaigns as a continuation of the civil rights movement that won rights for black Americans in the 1950s and ’60s. He has called gay rights one of “the defining civil rights challenges of our time.”

Currently, six state AG’s have refused to defend gay marriage bans in courtrooms while still enforcing the laws.

(source)

Florida: Sharon Gless records video in support of marriage equality

LGBT ally Sharon Gless has recorded a video in support of marriage equality in Florida, where she has had a home for 20 years.

The video is in support of Equality Florida’s Get Engaged campaign, with which Gless has been active for some time. “I can’t imagine what my life would be like if someone told me I couldn’t marry the person I love,” she says in the video. “Yet that is what is going on in the state of Florida every day, when they tell thousands of men and women that they cannot have what want we all want.”

Marriage equality comes early to Illinois

A federal judge in Illinois ruled today that same-sex marriage can begin immediately:

“There is no reason to delay further when no opposition has been presented to this Court and committed gay and lesbian couples have already suffered from the denial of their fundamental right to marry,” U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman said in her ruling.

Although Illinois was the 16th state to legalize marriage equality, the law wasn’t slated to begin until June 1st of this year.

Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum will not defend same-sex marriage ban in court

Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum announced today that she will not defend the state against the marriage equality lawsuit filed in federal court in October.

Rosenblum said that she will continue to enforce the gay marriage ban until the court rules, but added that the ban “cannot withstand a federal constitutional challenge under any standard of review.”

Several state Attorney Generals across the country have taken several steps regarding state bans on marriage equality. In Pennsylvania, Virginia, Nevada and more, the AG’s say the laws are unconstitutional and can’t withstand court fights.

A Democrat, Rosenblum is the state’s first female Attorney General.

Sen. Ted Cruz: The Obama Administration is “hostile” to “traditional marriage”

Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas

Senator Ted Cruz of Texas says the Obama Administration is “hostile” to traditional marriage:

“This administration is the most hostile to traditional marriage administration this country has ever seen.

“The administration has been using the authority of the federal government to try to force states, to force federal recognition of marriages that state law prohibits.

“The Obama administration came into Utah and said, ‘We’re not going to listen to what the U.S. Supreme Court said. We, the federal government, are going to recognize marriages in the state of Utah and Utah state law explicitly does not recognize as marriage’ and that was really, in my view, an abuse of power.”

What’s interesting about this is perspective. Ted Cruz sees a “hostile” administration. I see people across America working to ensure equality for everyone.

The legalization of marriage equality has NO effect whatsoever on anyone’s “traditional marriage.”

None. None. None.

What Cruz objects to is the idea that the LGBT community, who has traditionally been forced to second class citizenship, is somehow finding it’s way to the same rights of other Americans.

The Senator is out making the rounds anywhere he can to help promote his doomed anti-gay State Marriage Defense Act which would, according to Cruz, “protect states from the federal government’s efforts to force any other definition upon them.”

You can listen to Cruz on right wing crackpot David Barton’s radio show below:

Indiana: State Senate approves amended marriage equality ban

The Indiana state Senate just approved HJR-3 which would send a referendum to voters for approval of a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.

Lawmakers in the GOP-controlled chamber voted 32-17 on House Joint Resolution 3, which the body advanced to a final reading last week even though it was stripped of language banning civil unions and other similar arrangements by the state’s House — disqualifying the ban from appearing on this November’s ballot.

A referendum on a constitutional change requires passage of the bill with the exact same language in consecutive General Assemblies.

Because a line was removed from the version passed last year,  the clock restarts and must the bill must be passed in 2015 or 2016 before it could go to voters in the 2016 election.

By that point in time, the Supreme Court may have already ruled on the issue.  OR, with the polls showing shifting attitudes towards marriage equality, the bill may have no chance at all with voters in Indiana.

Alabama: Lawsuit filed regarding recognition of same-sex marriages from other states

A gay man in Alabama has filed suit against the state challenging the current ban on same-sex marriage.

Paul Hard filed the suit hoping to repeal laws banning legal recognition of his marriage that was performed in Massachusetts.

From SeattlePi.com: 

Plaintiff Paul Hard and David Fancher, both of Montgomery, were married in 2011. Three months later, Fancher was killed in a car accident.

Hard says hospital staff initially refused to speak with him, and Fancher’s death certificate says he died unmarried. Hard is also not recognized as the surviving spouse in a wrongful death lawsuit.

Marriage News Watch – February 17, 2014

From the American Foundation for Equal Rights:

Virginia’s marriage ban is unconstitutional, with a strongly-worded victory in AFER’s case.

And that’s just the start of multiple marriage wins from coast to coast this week. We have good news coming out of Kentucky, Indiana, and Nevada, plus several new lawsuits, hearings, and favorable polls.

Mitt Romney says it will take a long time to determine societal effects of same-sex marriage

During an appearance this morning on NBC’s Meet The Press, failed GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney was asked by host David Gregory if his position on same-sex marriage had changed. Not surprisingly, Romney responded it has not.

Via Mediaite:

Gregory asked if the expansion of gay marriage rights has had a “negative impact on society.” Romney said that he believes marriage is an institution that exists between a man and a woman and the “ideal” situation in which to raise children is in a family with a father and a mother.

“I think it’s going to take a long, long time to determine whether having gay marriage will make it less likely for kids to be raised in settings where there’s a mom and a dad,” Romney said. “That’s not going to happen overnight. It’s something which happens over generations.”

Asked whether the conservative right had lost the fight over marriage equality, Romney said that the issue of “who wins and who loses” over this issue is irrelevant. “Sometimes, if something is lost, you move on to the next issue,” he concluded.

Speaking of “once something is lost” – why are we still asking Mr. Romney his opinion?  Hasn’t he lost enough at the ballot box that HE moves on?

(source)