Hillary Clinton Circles Back To Reagan/AIDS Comment With Depth

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has issued a second and far more in-depth response to her misstatements about the Reagans’ record on AIDS/HIV.

As someone who felt great hurt by her overreach about the role of the Reagans in terms of AIDS in the 1980s, I feel this is thoughtful and heartfelt.

I appreciate that she came back to this with more than a simple apology.

Clinton’s full statement:

Yesterday, at Nancy Reagan’s funeral, I said something inaccurate when speaking about the Reagans’ record on HIV and AIDS. Since then, I’ve heard from countless people who were devastated by the loss of friends and loved ones, and hurt and disappointed by what I said. As someone who has also lost friends and loved ones to AIDS, I understand why. I made a mistake, plain and simple.

I want to use this opportunity to talk not only about where we’ve come from, but where we must go in the fight against HIV and AIDS.

To be clear, the Reagans did not start a national conversation about HIV and AIDS. That distinction belongs to generations of brave lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people, along with straight allies, who started not just a conversation but a movement that continues to this day.

The AIDS crisis in America began as a quiet, deadly epidemic. Because of discrimination and disregard, it remained that way for far too long. When many in positions of power turned a blind eye, it was groups like ACT UP, Gay Men’s Health Crisis and others that came forward to shatter the silence — because as they reminded us again and again, Silence = Death.

They organized and marched, held die-ins on the steps of city halls and vigils in the streets. They fought alongside a few courageous voices in Washington, like U.S. Representative Henry Waxman, who spoke out from the floor of Congress. Then there were all the people whose names we don’t often hear today — the unsung heroes who fought on the front lines of the crisis, from hospital wards and bedsides, some with their last breath.

Slowly, too slowly, ignorance was crowded out by information. People who had once closed their eyes opened their hearts. If not for those advocates, activists, and ordinary, heroic people, we would not be where we are in preventing and treating HIV and AIDS. Their courage — and their refusal to accept silence as the status quo — saved lives.

We’ve come a long way. But we still have work to do to eradicate this disease for good and to erase the stigma that is an echo of a shameful and painful period in our country’s history. This issue matters to me deeply. And I’ve always tried to do my part in the fight against this disease, and the stigma and pain that accompanies it. At the 1992 Democratic National Convention, when my husband accepted the nomination for president, we marked a break with the past by having two HIV-positive speakers — the first time that ever happened at a national convention.

As First Lady, I brought together world leaders to strategize and coordinate efforts to take on HIV and AIDS around the world. In the Senate, I put forward legislation to expand global AIDS research and assistance and to increase prevention and education, and I proudly voted for the creation of PEPFAR and to defend and protect the Ryan White Act. And as secretary of state, I launched a campaign to usher in an AIDS-free generation through prevention and treatment, targeting the populations at greatest risk of contracting HIV.

The AIDS crisis looks very different today. There are more options for treatment and prevention than ever before. More people with HIV are leading full and happy lives. But HIV and AIDS are still with us. They continue to disproportionately impact communities of color, transgender people, young people and gay and bisexual men. There are still 1.2 million people living with HIV in the United States today, with about 50,000 people newly diagnosed each year. In Sub-Saharan Africa, almost 60 percent of people with HIV are women and girls. Even though the tools exist to end this epidemic once and for all, there are still far too many people dying today.

That is absolutely inexcusable.

I believe there’s even more we can — and must — do together. For starters, let’s continue to increase HIV and AIDS research and invest in the promising innovations that research is producing. Medications like PrEP are proving effective in preventing HIV infection; we should expand access to that drug for everyone, including at-risk populations. We should call on Republican governors to put people’s health and well-being ahead of politics and extend Medicaid, which would provide health care to those with HIV and AIDS.

We should call on states to reform outdated and stigmatizing HIV criminalization laws. We should increase global funding for HIV and AIDS prevention and treatment. And we should cap out-of-pocket expenses and drug costs—and hold companies like Turing and Valeant accountable when they attempt to gouge patients by jacking up the price of lifesaving medications.

We’re still surrounded by memories of loved ones lost and lives cut short. But we’re also surrounded by survivors who are fighting harder than ever.

We owe it to them and to future generations to continue that fight together. For the first time, an AIDS-free generation is in sight. As president, I promise you that I will not let up until we reach that goal. We will not leave anyone behind.

Official Statement From Clinton Campaign Regarding Nancy Reagan / AIDS “National Conversation”

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/708403247795539968

Hillary Clinton’s campaign has issued this official statement regarding her statement yesterday at Nancy Reagan’s funeral that the Reagan’s helped begin a “national conversation” on AIDS.”

“As Hillary Clinton has said, while the Reagans were strong advocates for stem cell research and finding a cure for Alzheimer’s disease, she misspoke about their work on HIV and AIDS.

“Hillary Clinton has been a longtime advocate on the treatment and prevention of HIV and AIDS.

“In 1992, for the first time ever, the DNC Convention highlighted the AIDS plague and Bill and Hillary Clinton discussed the need to cure the AIDS plague in this country.

“As First Lady, Clinton traveled the world to raise awareness on combating AIDS and assembled government officials and world leaders to discuss how to enhance and coordinate AIDS efforts.

“As Senator, Clinton introduced and voted for legislation to improve and expand global AIDS research and assistance, improve global AIDS programs for women and girls, and prevention and education services.

“As Secretary of State, Clinton began an ambitious campaign to usher in an AIDS-free generation, focusing on improvements in treatment and prevention practices. This blueprint consisted of five goals:

1. Rapidly scaling up the most effective prevention and treatment interventions;

2. Targeting the populations at the greatest risk of contracting HIV, including key populations at risk of discrimination;

3. Promote sustainability, efficiency and effectiveness in the treatment of HIV/AIDS to ensure that we get the most out of every dollar spent;

4. Ensuring a global effort to achieve an AIDS free generation; and

5. Support research on innovative technologies for prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS.

“As President, she will continue to drive towards the goal of an AIDS-free generation and will:

• Call on Republican governors to extend Medicaid coverage to provide life-saving health care to people living with HIV. Clinton believes that every state should extend Medicaid coverage to provide life-saving health care to people living with HIV.

• Cap out-of pocket expenses for people with HIV/AIDS. Clinton has announced a plan to hold the pharmaceutical industry accountable and to achieve lower drug costs for Americans, including for medications that help treat HIV and reduce the risk of contracting AIDS. Clinton will ensure that Americans can get the care their doctors prescribe by requiring health insurance plans to cap covered out-of-pocket prescription drug costs at $250. She also will allow Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices and will stop direct-to-consumer advertising subsidies for drug companies—reinvesting those funds in research.

• Expand the utilization of HIV prevention medications, including pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). While we work to diagnose and treat all Americans with HIV and AIDS, we also must work to prevent exposure. Decades of research are beginning to offer a promising path to prevention. Clinton will increase the CDC investment to ensure populations at greatest risk of infection have access to the drug, and encourage states to follow suit.”

Hillary Clinton’s Major “Nancy Reagan/AIDS” Mistake

I can’t write too much about this because it is, to be honest, physically painful that someone I have admired and championed for over 20 years could make this statement in public.


“It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s.

“Because of both President and Mrs. Reagan, in particular Mrs. Reagan, we started a national conversation when before nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it. And that too is something that I really appreciate with her very effective low-key advocacy, but it penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, ‘Hey, we have to do something about this, too.’

The Reagans infamously ignored the AIDS epidemic as it swept the country in the United States during the 1980s. It wasn’t until May 1987 when President Reagan even said the word “AIDS” in public. By that point, tens of thousands of gay men had died due to the disease.

I can’t wrap my head around the idea that a woman as smart as Hillary Clinton could say that the Reagans “started a national conversation” about AIDS and HIV.

She knew she was going to be making public statements today. No one in her position goes out on TV without vetting what she’s going to say with her team. Her campaign manager is an openly gay man. She has gay advisers. WHO would have seen this comment prepped for her and not raised a huge red flag?

I can’t express how much this pains me.

I saw she later issued her regrets saying she “misspoke.” While I can’t defend the comment itself, I will say she responded quickly and unequivocally. There was no hedging, it was a straight up apology.

Perhaps as a former First Lady herself she felt the need to be overly gracious and got a bit past herself.

It doesn’t fix the massive misstatement. I see how the issue of mistrust happens now. But at the very least, she did apologize.

Along the way, major figures in the LGBT community chimed in:

ABC News/Washington Post Poll: Donald Trump Would Lost To Hillary Clinton

Donald Trump loves to talk about how he leads in polls.

But he’s not going to like the news today.

Earlier I posted results from the most recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll showing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton beating Trump in a hypothetical head-to-head match-up 51%-38%.

Now, ABC News/Washington Post poll echoes those results showing Clinton would beat Trump by 9 points,  50%-41%. This marks Clinton’s widest lead in this poll since September.

Additionally, only 30% of Americans see Trump favorably versus 67% unfavorably.

While Clinton is also underwater by that metric, she is in better shape with 46% favorable / 52% unfavorable numbers.

No wonder the GOP establishment is walking into walls over the Donald’s prospective candidacy.

More from the poll below:

Pollsters Blindsided By Bernie Sanders’ Michigan Primary Win

The big story today is Sen. Bernie Sanders surprise win in the Michigan Democratic primary last night.

I say surprise because virtually every pollster and prognosticator in politics had pegged Hillary Clinton to win by double digits.

Check the screen capture above of the most recent polls aggregated by Real Clear Politics.

This morning, pundits are saying this will be remembered as one of the biggest upsets in electoral politics.

New Poll Shows Hillary Clinton & Bernie Sanders Both Would Beat Donald Trump In General Election

The latest NBC/Wall Street Journal poll shows both Democratic contenders for president, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders, would beat GOP front-runner Donald Trump in hypothetical head to head match ups.

Clinton clocks The Donald by 13 points (51%-38%), and Sanders does even better besting Trump by 18 points (55%-38%).

Ted Cruz pulls the race tighter but Clinton still would win today by 2 points (47%-45%).

In fact, it’s Sen. Marco Rubio who has the strongest showing in a head-to-head against Clinton – a tie at 46%-46%.

But with talk of Rubio’s campaign on life support, I’m not seeing that scenario happen.

Also from the poll:

• 61% of Americans think Trump is “harmful” to the Republican party

• 55% of Americans disapprove of Senate Republican’s plan to block the nomination of a replacement for recently deceased Antonin Scalia.

• If the GOP candidates were in a two man race, Trump would lose in every scenario:

Trump – 40%
Cruz – 57%

Trump – 43%
Rubio – 56%

Trump – 40%
Kasich – 57%

Who Wins In Donald Trump/Hillary Clinton Matchup?

The above image was shared via Instagram by hip-hop business magnate Russell Simmons.

And he’s right – even though Trump repeats that the polls show he would beat Hillary Clinton, he’s not being truthful.

Here’s a link to the Real Clear Politics page tracking polls that ask the question: “Who would you vote for in a head-to-head matchup of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump?”

Here’s the latest list of polls and average:

(click image to enlarge)

HIllary Clinton Tweets During #GOPdebate

Gallup Poll: Hillary Clinton’s Net Favorable Approval Surpasses Bernie Sanders

Gallup Polling reports Hillary Clinton's Net Favorable Approval Rating has surpassed Sen. Bernie Sanders by 11 points

Good news for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as Gallup reports her Favorable score has not only surged in just the past few weeks, but surpassed her opponent, Sen. Bernie Sanders by 11 points.

Clinton’s net favorable score stands at +55 for the week of Feb. 18-24, 2016, a 10-percentage-point increase from her low point recorded over Jan. 27-Feb.10. This latter time period overlapped with her landslide loss to Sanders in the New Hampshire primary.

Sanders’ net favorable over the past week, by contrast, stands at +44, well below Clinton’s score and a steep fall from the +57 he boasted in late January/early February.