
It the course of his order, US District Judge Gregory Presnell at one point concluded that the law’s restrictions on and definitions of “adult live performance” — codified as § 827.11 — are “dangerously susceptible to standardless, overbroad enforcement which could sweep up substantial protected speech.”
While the state claimed the law aims to “protect children” by banning children from covered performances, Presnell cut through that claim quickly and throughout his 24-page opinion. From the opening paragraph, Presnell, an 80-year-old Clinton appointee, called out the state of Florida’s actions as actually being an attempt “to suppress the speech of drag queen performers.”
He also noted that the Florida law has “apparent universal application … to anyone, anywhere,” including — “conceivably” — “a skit at a backyard family barbecue.”
Presnell also noted the lack of any parental consent exceptions writing that the law “does not allow for the exercise of parental discretion.” Currently, state law guarantee the rights of parents to make decisions in the best interests of their children. https://twitter.com/tcmassie/status/1672334870113075204 https://twitter.com/JusticeHorn_/status/1672359993201381376
Discover more from The Randy Report
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.