It’s not complicated: If you are too dangerous to fly in America, you are too dangerous to buy a gun in America.
https://t.co/PbUHmAGCzU— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) December 4, 2015
New York Times Runs First Front Page Op-Ed Since 1920 Calling For Gun Control
Not to be outdone by the New York Daily News, the New York Times runs it’s first front page op-ed since 1920 calling for gun control laws.
It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency. These are weapons of war, barely modified and deliberately marketed as tools of macho vigilantism and even insurrection. America’s elected leaders offer prayers for gun victims and then, callously and without fear of consequence, reject the most basic restrictions on weapons of mass killing, as they did on Thursday. They distract us with arguments about the word terrorism. Let’s be clear: These spree killings are all, in their own ways, acts of terrorism.
Opponents of gun control are saying, as they do after every killing, that no law can unfailingly forestall a specific criminal. That is true. They are talking, many with sincerity, about the constitutional challenges to effective gun regulation. Those challenges exist. They point out that determined killers obtained weapons illegally in places like France, England and Norway that have strict gun laws. Yes, they did.
But at least those countries are trying. The United States is not. Worse, politicians abet would-be killers by creating gun markets for them, and voters allow those politicians to keep their jobs. It is past time to stop talking about halting the spread of firearms, and instead to reduce their number drastically — eliminating some large categories of weapons and ammunition.
It is not necessary to debate the peculiar wording of the Second Amendment. No right is unlimited and immune from reasonable regulation.
NY Daily News & More Slam Congress On Lack Of Gun Control Legislation
An early look at tomorrow’s front page… GOD ISN’T FIXING THIS: https://t.co/eKUg5f03ec pic.twitter.com/j4gEFg9YtJ
— New York Daily News (@NYDailyNews) December 3, 2015
#SanBernadino: Does the USA need to take “action” or just say keep saying prayers? Choose wisely, American voters. pic.twitter.com/bSYRuZiL05
— Memeographs (@memeographs) December 2, 2015
Think and pray about passing sensible gun reforms, Dr. Paul https://t.co/16czqfbH8n
— igorvolsky (@igorvolsky) December 2, 2015
The victims of these now daily mass shootings need more than thoughts & prayers. They need action. We must REFUSE to accept this as normal.
— Rep. John Yarmuth (@RepJohnYarmuth) December 2, 2015
USA has tried “praying the massacres away.” Maybe time to try something new? #SanBernadino @RealBenCarson https://t.co/Mla58tHU6Z
— Scott Wooledge (@Clarknt67) December 2, 2015
Advice for our politicians, let’s have less thoughts, prayers & condolences, and more anger, outrage & actionable solutions. #SanBernadino
— jasonrothlv (@jasonrothlv) December 2, 2015
Sen. Bernie Sanders: “We Need Sensible Gun-Control Legislation”
Democratic White House hopeful Sen. Bernie Sanders issued this statement regarding today’s mass gun violence in Oregon:
“The American people are horrified by these never-ending mass shootings. Our hearts go out to the families and friends of the innocent victims.
“As a nation, we must do everything we can to put an end to this awful epidemic of senseless slaughter.
“We need a comprehensive approach. We need sensible gun-control legislation which prevents guns from being used by people who should not have them. We must greatly expand and improve our mental health capabilities so individuals and families can get the psychological help they need when they need it.
“We also have to tone down the incredibly high level of gratuitous violence which permeates our media. The shouting at each other must end. The hard work of developing good policy must begin.”