Former boyfriend of Cain accuser backs her story

Victor Zuckerman said today he backs ex-girlfriend Sharon Bialek’s allegation that Herman Cain “touched her in an inappropriate manner.”

Zuckerman, a pediatrician, came forward after Cain last week denied knowing Bialek.

The GOP presidential candidate said the incident Bialek described from 1997 “simply did not happen.”

Bialek, a Chicago-area woman, came forward last week and alleged Cain put his hand up her skirt and groped her when she asked his help in finding a job.

In a statement read to reporters in Shreveport, La., Zuckerman says Bialek went to dinner with Cain in Washington and returned “upset. She said Mr. Cain had touched her in an inappropriate manner.”

The doctor, who described himself as a Republican, said he came forward to “aid the public in evaluating the statements previously made by Mr. Cain and Ms. Bialek.”

Allred says Bialek’s allegations are relevant because Cain is running for president.

Zuckerman says Bialek was “livid” hearing Cain deny claims of sexual harassment, which is what he says prompted her to come forward last week. The doctor says he was the one who suggested she contact Allred.

More at USAToday

Advance thoughts on upcoming final season of “Mad Men”

The last season of Mad Men hasn’t even started yet, but the show’s creator Matthew Weiner already has an idea of what the finale will look like.

As fans wait out agonizing months, Weiner’s given a little hint at what next season holds. The seventh and final season, which won’t start until 2012, will end with Don Draper as an 84 year old man, Weiner told Grantland’s Lane Brown.

I do know how the whole show ends. It came to me in the middle of last season. I always felt like it would be the experience of human life. And human life has a destination. It doesn’t mean Don’s gonna die. What I’m looking for, and how I hope to end the show, is like … It’s 2011. Don Draper would be 84 right now. I want to leave the show in a place where you have an idea of what it meant and how it’s related to you. It’s a very tall order …

The show has come a long way in those seven seasons. In his interview with Brown, Weiner is reminiscent of the show’s scrappier days, when focus groups called the Emmy winning machine “too slow” and “too boring.”

I remember downloading the pilot for free on iTunes.  Watching it I was turned off by the clear misogynous and racial under currents.  But found it fascinating at the same time due to how true to the period it was.

I’m very much looking forward to seeing where Matt Weiner takes the last season.

NBC interview with Jerry Sandusky from 1987

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Jerry Sandusky in a 1987 NBC interview: “I enjoy being around children… I just have a good time with them.” “Everybody needs people to care for them, even if sometimes they don’t want it.”

Although out of context, with the new perspective of the 40 alleged sexual charges against children today, the statements make for a chilling listening experience today.

Mixed reviews for possible Broadway bound “Bring It On” in LA

Charles McNulty, LA Times: Boisterous, obvious, stylistically confused and not-ready-for-Broadway. Never have I been so aware of calories burned onstage before. But who goes to a musical to vicariously sweat? “Bring It On” has interminable pep but leaves more discerning theatergoers with little to cheer about. The intense cardio-dance routines, choreographed with gymnastic vim and vigor by the director, Andy Blankenbuehler, are a surefire way of raising the musical’s pulse. They’re also infinitely preferable to the cartwheels and somersaults of Jeff Whitty’s protracted libretto (yes, they’re calling this plot-heavy machine, inspired by the 2000 movie “Bring It On,” written by Jessica Bendinger, a libretto). Whitty, who won a Tony for his book for “Avenue Q,” is a geyser of kooky charm and clever reversals, but the story too often belabors what should be dispatched in theatrical shorthand.

Bob Verini, Variety: Judges would grant the highest scores to the score, which quickly dispels any apprehension about melding the disparate talents of “In the Heights” (Lin-Manuel Miranda), “High Fidelity” (Tom Kitt and Amanda Green) and “Next to Normal” (Kitt). Miranda surely took first chair in penning the funky rap for urban Jackson High, but the overall cohesion leaves no reason to disbelieve the team’s claims of group accomplishment.

Tanner Stransky, Entertainment Weekly: Bring It On: The Musical may be ready for a national tour, but seems more like junior varsity when it comes to Broadway. Some of the characters are pompom-wielding clichés, from the feisty fat girl Bridget (Ryann Redmond) to the mouthy, bitchy friend Skylar (Kate Rockwell). There are some rough patches in the overlong production: an under-the-surface swirl of racial drama that never quite gels; a pretty unnecessary love story for Campbell; and rage-filled dream interludes that are ripped from the movie but don’t play so well on stage. While the numbers are energetic, none are particularly memorable. And designer David Korins’ sparse set, dominated by four moving screens, also leaves much to be desired.

Timothy Kuryak, BroadwayWorld: The music and lyrics do the show no favors either. There is no incredible ballad, no truly incredible group number, or even a heartfelt duet. While not suggesting that a musical always has to have these things, unfortunately for something as American as cheerleading, you would think that the musical would have a number of catchy tunes that you’d remember days after you heard it. The musical styles of Kitt, who did an amazing job with “Next to Normal,” and Lin-Manuel Miranda, who wrote “In the Heights”, simply don’t lend themselves to this kind of subject matter. Both are highly skilled at a certain type of song, but the world of cheerleading just doesn’t play to their strengths.

Lawmakers deny insider trading in “60 Minutes” report

CBS News’ 60 Minutes aired a report last night alleging that several members of Congress have traded stock using information they received during private briefings or meetings, enabling them to profit from inside information.

By far the most damning story was about House Financial Services Chairman Spencer Bachus (R-AL), who in 2008, the day after receiving a private briefing from the nation’s chief economic officials on the extent of the financial crisis, proceeded to bet that the stock market would tank:

In mid September 2008 with the Dow Jones Industrial average still above ten thousand, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke were holding closed door briefings with congressional leaders, and privately warning them that a global financial meltdown could occur within a few days. One of those attending was Alabama Representative Spencer Bachus, then the ranking Republican member on the House Financial Services Committee and now its chairman.

While Congressman Bachus was publicly trying to keep the economy from cratering, he was privately betting that it would, buying option funds that would go up in value if the market went down. He would make a variety of trades and profited at a time when most Americans were losing their shirts.

CBS also criticized House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) for trading health stocks right before the public option was officially killed and noted that former Rep. Dennis Hastert (R) and former Sen. Judd Gregg (R) profited from steering federal earmarks towards projects in which they had a financial stake.

Read more at ThinkProgress

Washington State to pursue marriage equality in 2012

From ThinkProgress: In 2009, Washington voters approved an “everything but marriage” same-sex domestic partnership law, but this year activists are ready to “take the final step” and pass full marriage equality.

A new coalition of civil rights groups called Washington United for Marriage launches this week to encourage state legislators to approve same-sex marriage legislation.

A group of Democratic lawmakers has committed to introducing and advancing the legislation and Democrats have majorities in both chambers. Nevertheless, a difficult budget and some socially conservative Democrats still present a challenge to the bill’s advancement.

Click here to find out more about Washington United for Marriage

Supreme Court to hear ObamaCare case

The Supreme Court said today it will hear five hours of arguments in the health care case that has historic implications for government social policy and the 2012 election.

The Supreme Court decision on the health care law will not only decide the fate of the biggest piece of social legislation since Medicare, it also figures to play a major role in the 2012 presidential election.

The justices will hear arguments on the health care law in March; they are expected to rule by the end of the current term, which normally comes in late June.

Because of the timing of the ruling, the Supreme Court could possibly play a pivotal role in the presidential election next year.  A Supreme Court victory would embolden President Obama to tout the law as a major accomplishment of his first term.

The key legal question is whether the federal government has the right to force most Americans to buy health insurance.